Honest shortlist, with sources

The best Drata alternatives in 2026

A shortlist for teams comparing Drata at evaluation or renewal. Each option lists its genuine strengths and who it's best for — including where it beats us. Every competitor claim links to a public source and carries the date we last verified it.

Why teams look for a Drata alternative

Drata's Trust Center is a separate purchase since the SafeBase acquisition, which can raise the all-in cost.
Pricing scales by framework count, employee count, and add-ons — multi-framework teams feel this.
It is US-headquartered — EU/UK buyers sometimes need EU data residency by contract.
Some teams want IASME Cyber Assurance, ISO 22301, or a documented NIS2 reporting clock.

None of this means Drata is a bad product — it's a strong platform. These are just the situations where a different tool fits better.

1.Raize Orion

Our product

Multi-framework GRC built for UK/EU teams — 10 frameworks sharing one evidence base, hosted in the EU, at one all-in price per tier.

Strengths

Ships IASME Cyber Assurance and ISO 22301 (BCMS) — both uncommon on US-built platforms.
Native EU data residency (eu-west-2, London); sub-processors kept in the EU.
Built-in NIS2 24h / 72h / 1-month reporting clock with per-source SLAs.
Trust Center bundled at every tier; pricing is one all-in figure per tier with no per-employee scaling.
UK-based engineering + support, with direct founder access during the launch period.

Worth knowing

Raize does not perform audits — you bring (or choose) your own auditor and we supply the portal + evidence. It also does not ship FedRAMP, CMMC, or HITRUST today.

Best for: UK/EU teams running 3+ frameworks who want EU residency and predictable pricing, and who already have an auditor.

Source

Last verified: 2026-06-14

2.Vanta

The category leader, with the largest integration ecosystem and a mature platform.

Strengths

Very broad framework + integration coverage and a large customer base.
Trust Center included; deep security-questionnaire tooling.

Worth knowing

Pricing scales with both the number of frameworks and your employee count, so multi-framework programmes get expensive. US-headquartered.

Best for: US-centric startups that want the most established platform and the widest integration catalogue.

Source Full Raize Orion vs Vanta →

Last verified: 2026-06-14

3.Secureframe

A broad catalogue with notable depth in US-government and AI-governance frameworks.

Strengths

Ships US-gov frameworks (FedRAMP, CMMC 2.0) and an AI line (ISO 42001, EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF).
ML-powered security-questionnaire automation and an established auditor-partner network.

Worth knowing

Pricing is quote-only (three tiers, no public figures). IASME and ISO 22301 are not on the public frameworks list. US-headquartered.

Best for: Teams that need FedRAMP / CMMC or AI-governance frameworks alongside SOC 2 / ISO 27001.

Source Full Raize Orion vs Secureframe →

Last verified: 2026-06-14

4.Thoropass

Compliance software plus the audit itself, delivered by an AICPA-registered CPA firm.

Strengths

Bundles the actual audit (Thoropass Assurance is a registered CPA firm) — no hand-off to a separate auditor.
Strong on HITRUST and SOC 1, which many automation-first platforms do not offer.

Worth knowing

Pricing is not public. IASME and ISO 22301 are not on the public frameworks list. US-headquartered.

Best for: Teams that want one vendor for both the software and the attestation, or that need HITRUST / SOC 1.

Source Full Raize Orion vs Thoropass →

Last verified: 2026-06-14

See how Raize Orion fits your stack

Book a 30-minute call and we'll map your frameworks, team size and residency needs against your current Drata setup — honestly, including where Drata would serve you better.

Book a 30-min demo See what your auditor sees